Open Media Boston

metro news from the ground up

Comments

I am repeatedly shocked by the number of people who think that skirting the existing laws governing LEGAL immigration should be rewarded with sanctuary, services, and education. Forget about rights! I am married to someone who went through the legal channels for immigration and recently received a green card. Why don't we ask him and all those who dutifully obey the law how they feel about the rest.

Before we spend too much energy feeling bad for these poor rootless immigrants and their offspring, lets remember, we do have laws, and they have broken them.

Try this nonsense in any other country, they will laugh in your general direction, then arrest and deport your ass.

... and your assumption is what? That there are sufficient paths to citizenship to meet the demand?

Wrong.

First, there are huge barriers to entry to the U.S. for most immigrants. There is a highly-politicized, unfair and often racist system for determining immigration quotas from different nations. The immigration laws you refer to reflect the prejudices and caprices of the ever-fallible politicians and bureaucrats that created them. They are hardly monuments to good governance to be referred to in hushed tones as if one were discussing some holy writ.

The result of these laws is a tremendously complicated, expensive, overlong and opaque process for getting legal residency - let alone citizenship. There is a militarized southern border run by corrupt officials and a feral Border Patrol flanked by trigger-happy right-wing militia members. And now another several hundred miles of fence are to be added at the public expense to this already highly questionable enterprise.

Regarding your personal account, I'm pleased to hear that your spouse has become a legal resident. Congratulations to both of you.

But I'd need more information from your corner to determine what kind of proof in which pudding your spouse represents in this debate.

The most obvious questions being: What country did your spouse come from? What kind of work does your spouse do? What is your spouse's class background and racial background?

These questions are important because, for example, highly educated people with professional/managerial backgrounds from Europe (Eastern or Western) have a much higher chance of having the social capital (and capital capital) to be able to get a green card.

Meanwhile, less educated poor people from Mexico or Central America have an extremely low chance of getting any kind of legal status in the U.S.

The first group, far from coincidentally, is generally white. The second group is generally brown.

All this would have to be taken into account before your personal experience can be compared to the existing data and literature on the subject.

And then we'd have to ask: Does one family's (or one hundred's or ten thousand's) experience as the rare winners in a rigged game negate the evidence staring us in the face? That the existing immigration system is unjust and immoral for the reasons stated in the editorial above, and many other unstated reasons. That American tradition is to resist and reform unjust laws, not to cleave to them like totems, and use them to brand a vast swath of humanity as "illegal," unworthy of compassion and somehow undeserving of this nation's promise of a better life for all who come to our shores.

Second, not enough programs exist to help even a majority of undocumented immigrants on the path to citizenship. Even simple programs to educate people about the existing process are in short supply. And remember, the programs can never just be taught in English. They need to be taught in whatever languages the local immigrant populations speak - which further compounds the problem.

Massachusetts alone just agreed to spend under half of what advocates asked for to fund already woefully underfunded citizenship programs statewide. These programs cover only a fraction of the need for only a minority of the ethnic groups in need of such services. And they don't exist everywhere they are needed.

Barnstable, Dukes, Franklin, Hampshire, Nantucket, Norfolk, and Plymouth counties have no citizenship programs available at all, according to some preliminary research I did last fall. North Central and West Central Massachusetts—including cities like Fitchburg, Gardner, and Holyoke have no citizenship programs. Worcester, Springfield, Leominster, Westfield, and Pittsfield have only a few. All cities with large numbers of immigrants. I won't reprint the whole report here, but rest assured the situation is dire and far worse in most states nationally.

Given all this, do you really think that the solution to the problem of legions of undocumented immigrants is just a simple matter obeying the law (and this without further discussion of the political-economic dimensions of these issues)? If so, why?

Finally, in response to your comment on the immigration policies of other countries, since you seem to be something of an expert of the subject, I await your full report on the matter with interest.

Be sure to use acceptable social science methodologies in constructing it, however, as we have a rather highly trained audience here at Open Media Boston.

User login